Beethoven, like Mozart before him, was a great innovator and always ready to throw established customs out of the window. This concerto is no exception, witness the opening: four quiet drum beats immediately answered by a serene, flowing melody in the woodwinds. It's clear immediately that this is not to be some virtuoso tour de force but perhaps a symphonic poem for solo violin and orchestra. The inscription to the first soloist, his friend Franz Clement, for whom it was written, reads: Concerto par Clemenza pour Clement... In addition to its meaning of mercifulness, Clemenza (clemency) also means mildness of temper, and that is the mood which the music captures so perfectly. Beethoven barely finished the parts before the premiere so that no proper rehearsal was possible. Furthermore, there was an intermission (including other music!) between the first and second movements! Perhaps the inauspicious first performance and the relative lack of fireworks contributed to the slow gain in popularity of the piece - it didn't really take off until Joachim played it in London (under Mendelssohn) in 1844.
I like to think of this as Beethoven's concerto for violin and bassoon because of the masterful and extensive writing for the latter instrument. Of course, I could be slightly biased!
After a fairly lengthy introduction of the main themes of the first movement, the soloist first enters as if checking her tuning [Beethoven's little joke on the first soloist, perhaps?] then soaring into the heavens like a lark, followed by a restatement of the first subject. Through the development section, the movement alternates between vigor and compassion, creating a perfect balance of the two emotions which Beethoven himself most embodied.
The larghetto is sublime. Words can hardly do it justice, but note particularly the pizzicato string accompaniment in the second half of the movement. A cadenza then leads into a spirited rondo in 6/8 time, full of joy and energy.
Born 13 years after Dvorák and six before Mahler (both Bohemians, though much of the latter's childhood was spent just inside Moravia), Janáåek doesn't fit neatly into any period. However, as a somewhat late developer musically, he can be considered contemporary with Mahler - indeed most of his best work, including the present piece, was written after Mahler was already dead. And whereas Mahler "conducted [Opera] to live, but lived to compose [Symphonies]", Janáåek composed mainly opera but conducted (and taught) choral, organ and instrumental music. Although, he became good friends with Dvorak (with whom he went on a walking tour of Bohemia in 1877), I was unable to find any record of his even meeting Mahler. Geographically speaking, Janáåek spent most of his life in or around Brno. He cared little for Vienna (chiefly because, as a Czech patriot, he had no sympathy with the occupying Austrians) - if he looked outside his homeland at all it was to Russia, the source of many of his literary inspirations, for example Tolstoy's Kreutzer Sonata. For much of his life he taught at the Brno Organ School (the precursor of today's conservatory - now known as the Janáåek School of Music), in later years as its director.
The great turning point in his career came in 1916 when his opera Jenùfa, after a lukewarm reception in Brno a few years earlier, was produced in the comparatively major city of Prague to great success. Shortly after (1918) came the moment he had been long awaiting: independence from Austria. These two milestones re-energized the composer and, despite his advancing years, he composed prodigiously, including the Sinfonietta and another of his most popular operas The Cunning Little Vixen, based on, of all things, a strip cartoon in the Brno daily newspaper. He was still busy working when he died of pneumonia in 1928.
Janáåek's most successful instrumental work, the Sinfonietta was written as a fanfare for a gymnastics festival although it also serves as a patriotic declaration to the new Czechoslovakia. It is in five movements arranged somewhat like an inverted double-decker sandwich. The real meat is in the outer and central movements, separated by two scherzo-like interludes. According to the composer, the movements "represent the imaginary glorification and salvation of the city of Brno". The titles which he gave for the first performance were: Fanfare-Parade; Castle; The Queen's Monastery [where he enrolled as a choirboy at age 11]; Street; Town Hall .
The fanfare of the first movement fairly bursts on the scene with blaring trumpets, brass and percussion demanding the listeners' attention. The bold theme is probably familiar to many music lovers even if they don't know the entire work. The allegretto which follows is a very rhythmic peasant-style dance. The slower central section (the Trio) opens out into a wonderful climax, courtesy of the trumpets and other brass. Next comes the real masterpiece: a movement whose characteristics vary from lush muted strings and harp (with pedal note in the tuba and bass clarinet) through solos for English horn and trombone to the ultra-seco (dry) driving syncopations towards the end. The following allegretto is based on a Moravian "mirror" rhythm. The final movement opens with a haunting flute melody ornamented by small arpeggio waves in the strings (a very characteristic style of this composer). At the conclusion of this section, the trumpets announce "we're back" and the music ends with a reprise of the fanfare.
References include:
Index of On-line SPM Program Notes
© This page copyright 1997 by Robin Hillyard and Symphony Pro Musica.
Please send comments to Robin Hillyard